China's
Military On the Move
By
Jeffrey Young
WASHINGTON,
D.C. (VOA) -- China
is emerging as a major economic power. It is also transforming
its massive military into a more modern and efficient
force, but this transformation is not necessarily intended
to
make its military capable of global power projection.
When
China's modern military came into being with the 1949 revolution
that swept Mao Zedong and the communists into
power, it relied
on massive manpower to achieve its objectives. Waves of Chinese
soldiers entered the Korean War in the early 1950s and turned
a U.S.-led advance into a stalemate.
Military
Technology
Today, a
nation's military strength is largely measured by its command
of technology and ability to integrate the operations
of its armed forces, not how many soldiers it has. This has been
the trend that the United States and Britain have followed.
Evan Medeiros, a China analyst with the RAND Corporation in
Washington, says Beijing is on a similar path.
"The Chinese P.L.A., or People's Liberation Army, has traditionally
always been the principal focus of the Chinese military. And
the army has been focusing in recent years on building a smaller,
more flexible, highly trained and well-equipped ground force,
one that can have more rapid-reaction units with enhanced special
operations capabilities, greater numbers of airborne troops,
larger amphibious capabilities and mechanized ground forces," says
Medeiros.
The P.L.A. is not just the Chinese army. It also encompasses
the air force and navy.
Christian Le Miere, the Asia-Pacific Editor of Jane's Country
Risk, says the army's long-standing central role and massive
numerical strength has been changing, and is more integrated
today with the other branches.
"The army has received less funding than the air force
and the navy over the last 20 years. There is currently approximately
1.6 million personnel in the active [duty] army. That number
is being reduced by about 200,000. And, with the other services,
there is a major drive to modernize the army for joint service
operations," says Le Miere.
As for where joint operations involving the army, the navy and
the air force might be directed, the short answer for many analysts
is the island of Taiwan, off the coast of mainland China.
Taiwan Policy
 |
Taiwanese
soldiers on parade.
Photo
by S.L. Herman / VOA Photo |
When the
communists defeated the forces of Nationalist Chinese leader
Chiang Kai Shek in 1949, the Nationalists retreated to
Taiwan, where they set up their own government. China has always
considered Taiwan to be a renegade province and has often stated
that it intends to get it back.
Philip Coyle, with the Washington-based Center for Defense Information,
says China's long-standing Taiwan policy is driving Beijing to
build a different navy than the sort that would be used for global
power projection.
"The kinds of surface ships that they'll be interested
in don't need to be great big cruisers and aircraft carriers
like the United States has," says Coyle. "They can
deal with smaller, frigate-sized, ships for the area in and around
Taiwan," says Coyle.
Coyle and other analysts also say Beijing wants to use its navy
to support its ambition to become an economic superpower. Achieving
that goal requires raw materials and oil from abroad, which need
to be protected on the high seas, especially in areas subject
to piracy such as the Strait of Mallaca between Malaysia and
Indonesia.
The U.S. and British navies have monitored sea lanes over the
years by having bases outside of their countries. John Pike,
the Director of the private military information group Global
Security.org, says Beijing is also headed in that direction.
"The Chinese have established bases in Burma. They are
building a naval base in Pakistan. And it looks like China is
looking, in the medium-term, to establish a naval presence in
the Indian Ocean that would enable them to protect their sea
lanes to make sure that they can get oil from the Persian Gulf
back to China," says Pike.
Air Force Modernization
Along with ships, aircraft are used for projecting power beyond
a nation's boundaries as well as for protecting its territory
from intruders. China has no long range strategic bombers like
America's B-52 and Russia's TU-95. China's air force is presently
configured for defense and the possibility of shorter-range offensive
operations against, for instance, Taiwan.
Christian Le Miere at Jane's Country Risk points out that China's
attempts to modernize its air force have not produced greater
capabilities.
"They
have bought some fairly modern equipment, in particular fourth-generation
[Russian] Sukhois [fighters]. But it took about
a decade to integrate these Sukhoi 27s into its air force. So
it does have small numbers - - we're talking hundreds, not thousands
- - of quite advanced aircraft. But the ability to utilize these
aircraft, particularly in joint operations, remains in question," Le
Miere.
As for nuclear
missiles, China has at least 20, and possibly up to 40 liquid-fueled
land-based ICBMs, which carry a roughly
four megaton warhead. China's submarine-launched missile program
is miniscule and its submarines do not conduct long-range patrols
as American submarines do. But Beijing has significantly built
up short-range missile installations across from Taiwan, as
the Pentagon has noted for several years in its annual report
to
Congress.
While China's efforts to modernize and streamline its armed
forces have been considerable - - costing an estimated $82 billion,
or 4.3 percent of its Gross Domestic Product last year - - most
analysts say Beijing's economic goals are its top priority, and
its military ambitions are subordinate. Yet others point to recent
large military budgets and say China clearly has ambitions to
project its power not only in its immediate region, but also
wherever it has economic and strategic interests.
But as for when China's military may achieve parity with the
United States and other first-world nations, the consensus among
most analysts is that the People's Liberation Army and its naval
and aviation branches are still decades away from such capabilities.